DIFF-CRASH

DIFF-CRASH is a software package for the stability analysis of crash simulations. Physical bifurcations in automobile design and numerical instabilities in simulation packages often cause extremely sensitive dependencies of simulation results on even the smallest model changes. Among other things, DIFF-CRASH allows the designer to find these critical structural regions and offers suggestions for their removal.

In collision simulations, quite often there are large deviations among the calculated results. These deviations are caused by rounding errors which either are incorporated systematically into the initial data or which result randomly from parallel computations. These errors can propagate either because of the model properties of because of the numerical algorithms used in the code. 

The figure shows a comparison of the results of simulations attained with PAM-CRASH. A BMW model with 60,000 elements was calculated on a parallel computer with distributed memory. Deviations simular to the one shown were also observed on SMP architectures. 

In order to investigate these effects, SCAI, together with ESI and the BMW-group developed DIFF-CRASH.

• processes the results of several simulation runs
• delivers a statistical analysis of the whole model as well as of individual nodes
• generates data formats which can be used by the VR-visualization system developed by FHI-IMK
• incorporates data into PAM-CRASH's simulation results so that they can be analyzed with PAM-VIEW

DIFF-CRASH

Figure 1 shows typical results from DIFF-CRASH simulations, which are displayed on the Institute's Responsive Workbench. The colors show diverse variations in the simulation results.

CONTACT 46

SCAI has analyzed larger variations in simulation results on a real BMW test model. It turned out that in many cases an edge-to-edge detection would have led to the correct simulation result. On a model which was reworked with CONTACT 46, substantially reduced variations were observed. Using the correct contact model influenced the simulation results.

Motor Carrier

Figure 5 shows variations of the results in the drivers foot area in the reworked model. This was perhaps due to the instability of a certain part of the motor carrier. Figure 6 shows a more detailed analysis: The variety of variations after a simulation run of 35 milliseconds was quite noticeable.